Debunking The Myth of the Vacuity of Ceteris Paribus Clauses

I have just found out that my paper 'Dispositions and Interferences' has been accepted for publication in Philosophical Studies. Even if, strictly speaking, it's not a philosophy of science paper, I hope that some of you might find it interesting, as it contributes to debunking the myth that ceteris paribus clauses cannot be spelled out in a clear and non-circular manner. Any comments would be greatly appreciated.