tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2264125276161269122.post6205914541255750197..comments2023-04-21T20:55:22.881-04:00Comments on It's Only A Theory: Title bout, round twoGabriele Contessahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13607158011908969169noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2264125276161269122.post-76407763054257955222012-01-04T13:42:12.877-05:002012-01-04T13:42:12.877-05:00Sorry about the title competition, P.D. — my fault...Sorry about the title competition, P.D. — my fault. ; ) Personally, I think you might insist on sticking with your original, pointing out that the MIT volume is quite different. But I do like "From Planets to Mallards". . . . Side note: I encountered a bit of this awkwardness too when I was asked to edit a *Monist* issue titled *Carving Nature at its Joints*. The metaphor is a big enough umbrella to cover multiple books, I think: but not by the same person! The let me go with *The Architecture of Reality*, fortunately.Matthewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09406323176431313733noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2264125276161269122.post-78714661318510342122011-12-28T19:31:03.955-05:002011-12-28T19:31:03.955-05:00Option 2 sounds good to me.Option 2 sounds good to me.Renato Rochahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14152255477044648035noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2264125276161269122.post-83946357512854140042011-12-18T15:17:51.823-05:002011-12-18T15:17:51.823-05:00Kareem: The hope was for something catchier, with ...Kareem: The hope was for something catchier, with the dry but accurate bit as subtitle. The discussion has been more vigorous elsewhere, and the current contender is "From Planets to Mallards: Scientific enquiry and natural kinds".P.D. Magnushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07799239684943144310noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2264125276161269122.post-56865608981388696442011-12-18T12:37:55.449-05:002011-12-18T12:37:55.449-05:00Hi PD,
How about the subtitle of the original as ...Hi PD, <br />How about the subtitle of the original as a stand-alone title, viz. "Scientific enquiry and natural kinds?"KKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07535420083612229353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2264125276161269122.post-75973915758981627572011-12-16T14:16:53.457-05:002011-12-16T14:16:53.457-05:00Scientific realism and natural kinds?Scientific realism and natural kinds?Stephen Downeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06140591903467372209noreply@blogger.com